Video thumbnail
Play

Online Safety Laws: Parental Protection vs State Control

Civil liberties champion Nathan Seiuli weighs up proposed online laws intended to protect children from internet harms. The founding head of PILLAR argues that a statutory ban risks expanding beyond its original scope, grants power to subjective arbitrators, and removes parental responsibility.

Instead, Mr Seiuli advocates for family-level solutions like New Zealand-made parental control tools (e.g. Safe Surf) over state intervention, stressing that privacy and freedom of speech and conscience remain non-negotiable pillars of democracy. (www.nzpillar.com)

Text 8168, keyword 'Comments' to share your thoughts.

~~~~

Tune into Thoughts & Comments from 10:00am - 2:00pm on the Rhema Media App.
-----------------------------------------------
| SOCIALS |
Follow us on INSTAGRAM!
- https://www.instagram.com/thoughtsandcommentsnz/
-
https://www.instagram.com/thebrightsidenz/
-
https://www.instagram.com/drivewithkatshow/
Visit
our WEBSITE! https://www.rhema.co.nz/home
Join
our FACEBOOK Page to engage with us! https://www.facebook.com/nzrhema

Support
Rhema: https://donate.rhemamedia.co.nz/?brand=rhema

Would
you like to pray for others or have a prayer request? 🙏
- Our Prayer Wall: https://www.rhema.co.nz/faith/prayerwall

To
contact the studio
- Email: studio@rhema.co.nz
- Phone: 0508 474362
- (NZ) Text: 8168 with the keyword: RHEMA

Recent videos