Video thumbnail
Play

Enrolment Cut-Off: Is Two Weeks Really Too Much?

Nathan Seiuli of PILLAR weighs up what freedom really looks like ahead of New Zealand’s election, from the earlier enrolment cut-off to the policies of the major parties.

Mr Seiuli argues that voting is a luxury won through the sacrifice of earlier generations rather than a right, and that enrolling two weeks out is a reasonable ask. He warns that neither major party measures up on freedom, highlighting the gang patch ban as a framework that could be applied to any club, and proposed online safety rules that risk censoring everyone. He also urges Christians to stay informed and engaged, saying faith in Christ doesn’t exempt believers from serving others through their vote. (https://www.nzpillar.com)

Chapters
0:29
The earlier enrolment cut-off
0:58 Voting: a right or a luxury?
2:01 Party incentives & remembering sacrifice
3:49 A freedom test for the major parties
4:52 The gang patch ban
5:20 “Fashion police” warning
6:51 State control of the internet
8:28 Why Christians should stay engaged

#NZElection2026 #VotingInNZ #FreedomOfSpeech #OnlineSafety #GangPatchBan

------------------------------------------------
| SOCIALS |
Follow us on INSTAGRAM!
- https://www.instagram.com/thoughtsandcommentsnz/
-
https://www.instagram.com/thebrightsidenz/
-
https://www.instagram.com/rhemadriveshow/
Visit
our WEBSITE! https://www.rhema.co.nz/home
Join
our FACEBOOK Page to engage with us! https://www.facebook.com/nzrhema

Support
Rhema: https://donate.rhemamedia.co.nz/?brand=rhema

Would
you like to pray for others or have a prayer request? 🙏
- Our Prayer Wall: https://www.rhema.co.nz/faith/prayerwall

To
contact the studio
- Email: studio@rhema.co.nz
- Phone: 0508 474362
- (NZ) Text: 8168 with the keyword: RHEMA

Recent videos